Wednesday 8 September 2010

I just don't understand ... do you?

If I love a book, I will buy and read everything from that same author. But I make sure I don't read them all in a row because I don't want to get sick of their style. I'm not sure this would happen, but I'm not going to take the risk. There's always too much of a good thing, right?

Anyway, that's not really my point today. What I don't understand is, how I can love, adore, cherish, do cartwheels over every single book these beloved authors of mine have written, except for the ones that have been awarded with prizes. What is the deal with that? Is this just me and my off-beat mind making life difficult? Has this ever happend to you? And, if so, do you understand why the worst out of their collection gets awarded? I just don't get it ...

35 comments:

  1. I once bought a book called PS I LOVE YOU by Celia Aherne I lvoed the book then went out everytime a new one appeared at the bookshop.
    She is a fantastic writer amd I do honestly enjoy each book.

    Enjoyed your post as always very interesting.

    Yvonne.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ooo. . .that is a tough question. For me it might be that the books which are awarded prizes are more literary, which I don't tend to read. Not sure if it's that simple or not, though. Hope that makes sense!

    ReplyDelete
  3. This doesn't really happen to me, but I could speculate that sometimes awards are given out to authors because their previous work has established them as an award worthy writer, even when their newest novel is not quite the same. Not sure though.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I reckon you just don't appreciate books along the same lines as the alleged eliteratti. In more ways than one, you should be happy about that.

    Often, when people spend their time deconstructing and analyzing books, they develop a completely different system of values and also stop appreciating books as regular readers... Oh yeah, and of course, depending on the award internal politics often play a disappointingly large part.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I totally agree with you and do the same thing!

    Often times I'll read something and not even know that it's won award *_____*. After reading the book, I'll write something or say something about why I didn't like it, and that's when someone will point out that it's a great book because it won *_____* and how could I not like it? I've also been grossly disappointed numerous times because people will suggest books to me that won various things... and then they suck, at least in my own opinion, and many times in comparison to the author's other books.

    I always figured I was just a weirdo for not 'getting' the award winning books most of the time.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hmm...you know, sometimes the hype surrounding a book can actually influence us in a negative way.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hype isn't always a great thing. Sometimes it leaves you feeling let down if someone gives it too much praise. Guess there is such a thing as "too much of a good thing"

    ReplyDelete
  8. I do think there is the whole expectations thing. But I also think that award winning books are different than best selling books we fall in love with. the best combo is a best selling book that also wins awards - hard to find.

    ReplyDelete
  9. With a lot of awards, especially in more recent times, they attempt to judge the book as a stand alone and not as part of the author's body of work (I did a feature on this back in January - http://mithrilwisdom.blogspot.com/2010/01/very-thought-provoking-review-of.html).

    This means that, whilst the award panel look at this single book in terms of literary style, prose etc., you've fallen in love with the story as a whole, and so your favourite in the series will be the one with the most character development, the most conflict etc. I often find that with series', especially in fantasy, the most 'literary' is often the worst in terms of story and character.

    Either that, or you could have a form of indie-psychosis going on, like when people stop liking a music artist when they become popular in the mainstream (I'm kidding here, but I've seen it happen with a few people, hehe).

    ReplyDelete
  10. I totally hear you on that - and my best guess is that prize-winning books tend to lean more literary and I shy away from anything TOO literary because my reading time is precious and I don't want to think too much (unless it's for a writing friend...)

    As for not reading the same author's books in a row - I'm afraid my willpower is not so great. When I discover one I love, I tend to indulge. I'm on a Melissa Marr and Kelley Armstrong kick right now, two authors I didn't even read until this year.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I used to not read anything on the best seller lists. But then I started reading a lot more books and had to give in. Some are worth it, others not so much. I don't know why. Maybe because people as a society choose books they wouldn't necessarily pick as individuals?

    ReplyDelete
  12. I haven't really noticed a trend on this or anything, but sometimes (ducks and hide) it's the hardest to read of their books (sometimes it's literary fiction) that gets the highest praise.

    ReplyDelete
  13. That's a really good question. And I think Ellie is right in that it's usually more literary and the writer doesn't always follow through with another good piece. Also, some people write with the object of writing more books afterward. Some just want to write one great piece of art. When they do, and get awards, the publishers want more and give them a time line and it's not usually the timeline they had for the first book, so you get substandard work. That's just my two cents.

    CD

    ReplyDelete
  14. I so feel this! Maybe not like the worst of their stuff gets the award, but most books that I read that have won an award, I don't like. Or at least I don't think they're all that special. I don't know why... maybe I'm going into it biased? Who knows? All I know is that I don't get how a book wins an award if it's clearly not good. (Clearly to me, that is. :))

    ReplyDelete
  15. I love reading award winners! Sometimes I think another book should've won, but that's just more proof about how subjective this writing and publishing industry is. I certainly wouldn't want to be the judges panel handing out awards. How do they choose??? It must be difficult!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Strange conundrum. I don't think much about awards or notice them, I just read kind of how I write. I'm a pantser reader.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I don't notice awards often, but I have noticed this anomaly too. :/ Sometimes I wonder if it's because it's their first book that gets the award...and when they continue their awesomeness, the award-people feel like they can't just keep handing them out.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Yes. You're a nut job.

    (kidding)
    I think it depends on the award, but many awards are given for boundaries pushed, whether artistically, stylistically, or content-wise, and sometimes to me those feel like 'too much'--not always, but sometimes.

    As for books by the same author... A couple... divided in time (as you said)-unless they are a series, and the series has to have a grand, overarching plot or it bugs me. But I do get tired of a given voice if I don't give it a rest. I would get tired of my best friend if I spent day in and day out with her, with no OTHER people in between... I'd get tired of my family if... wait... I do get tired of my family... (sometimes I need a break)

    ReplyDelete
  19. I agree that a lot of books that win awards aren't as entertaining and sometimes hard to slough through.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I don't get it either. It's stupid, really. I know, tons of insight here.

    ReplyDelete
  21. This happens with my favorite movies, too. The ones the critics scorn are my faves, and the box office greats leave me saying, "Eh..."

    Hope your writing is going great!!

    ReplyDelete
  22. I don't pay much attention to awards. I read what appeals to me.

    Maybe you root for the underdog and once they get an award, they've blown it:)

    ReplyDelete
  23. Hi! That happened to me with Ann Enright and Banville, whose work I'd previously enjoyed - I wasn't able to finish either of their Booker Prize winning books! Soooo caught up in the detailed monotonous beauty of language and soo slow. I like emma donaghues writing esp Slammerkin and will be interested to see if "The Room" is tinged with the Booker Curse of unreadability.
    (Its funny, I commented about this exact topic earlier today on facebook)

    ReplyDelete
  24. There are a few cases where I've loved an author's previous book/series and the next one wins an award, but I haven't pick the book up because the premise doesn't appeal to me.

    With YA, there's such a diversity of awards, such as 'great book for reluctant readers,' that I usually don't pay attention to who got an award and for what. In the end, it's the story that counts. :)

    ReplyDelete
  25. Wow. You're totally right. I guess that I'll just have to hope that nothing I writes gets any kind of award huh?

    ReplyDelete
  26. Guess I need to pay more attention to my books - I never notice if one's received an award or not.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I think it's a subjective thing with books and prizes. I'm lucky in that I usually pick up a book I know I'll like, but I won't necessarily think it's a must read because of a prize. Someones literary prize winner can always turn out to be the book someone else hates :)

    ReplyDelete
  28. I think it's the people who award the prizes - it's not just books. Half the time, I'm not "getting" the movies that are winning Golden Globes or Best Picture at the Academy Awards (Hurt Locker? Good movie. Not what I would call the BEST. But I found the entire category lacking this year) or the tv shows winning the Emmy. I don't know if I'm just completely out of sync with those people who award literary, film and television awards or what? I'm glad I'm in good company, though!

    ReplyDelete
  29. Interesting question. This has certainly happened to me with classics. I never seem to like an author's most famous or "best" work. Take Jane Austen, for example. P&P is NOT my favorite. I like MANSFIELD PARK way better. Dickens? I hate A TALE OF TWO CITIES. Homer? THE ILIAD = way better than THE ODYSSEY. I feel like a lot of times, an author's "best" work is too hyped. We hear all these great things about it, but it can't live up to the standard. But with one of their other books, we don't expect much and we're pleasantly surprised.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Sigh--yes. I did the same thing with Nora Roberts. I devoured every one of her novels I could find. And there were some that I just didn't care for, so I branched out! Only to find the same problem. But not everyone will love everything.

    ~JD

    ReplyDelete
  31. I think you're just trying to make life difficult in your off-beat way.

    KIDding... lol! :D I don't know. I haven't really kept track of the award-winning books. I mostly just read by whether the story sounds interesting. I know, how BORING! ;p

    ReplyDelete
  32. I've seen "award winning" author so many times on the cover of a book I ignore it the same way I ignore "new and improved" on on food products.

    .........dhole

    ReplyDelete
  33. Yep, I tend not to like the books that win the prizes as much. Not sure why. It's sometimes because the writing style seems more important than the story.
    Lyn
    W.I.P. It: A Writer's Journey

    ReplyDelete
  34. Yeah. I should also pay more attention to awards. I'm such a bad wannabe author. Always out of the loop.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I HEAR YOU!!

    It's because they're chosen my poncy critics and not the general reading public. I have tried very hard to love many award-winning books but it just hasn't happened. The only one I loved was 'What was Lost', which won the Orange Prize a few years back.

    ReplyDelete

“I'm using my art to comment on what I see. You don't have to agree with it.” ~John Mellencamp

“Allowing an unimportant mistake to pass without comment is a wonderful social grace” ~Judith S. Marin

“I don't ever try to make a serious social comment.” ~Paul McCartney

“I'd make a comment at a meeting and nobody would even acknowledge me. Then some man would say the same thing and they'd all nod.” ~Charlotte Bunch

“Probably what my comment meant was that I don't care about the circumstances if I can tell the truth.” ~Sally Kirkland

“We're not going to pay attention to the silliness and the petty comments. And quite frankly, women have joined me in this effort, and so it's not about appearances. It's about effectiveness.” ~Katherine Harris