Wednesday 30 October 2013

The Artist Unleashed: WHY REJECTIONS AREN’T SO BAD, by Stina Lindenblatt

The Artist Unleashed posts have moved to a new domain. Please click HERE to read the rest of this post and for the opportunity to comment. Just search for the title of the post in the search bar on the new site.


  1. These are all valuable points, but the most important lesson rejection can teach is acceptance.
    The simple reality is that success and talent are not synonymous and never have been. Good and great writing gets rejected and bad writing gets accepted. It has ever been so.

    Many of those writers which are now called 'great' were rejected for years; many were not published until after they were dead. In a hoax a few years ago submissions using the work of some great writers were sent to agents and publishers and all were rejected. Can you imagine James Joyce and Ulysses even getting a look-in these days when the fashion is for 'shopping list' writing? He was serially and seriously rejected in his time until someone actually recognised brilliance but today he would be unlikely to be accepted by anyone.

    Which raises the other issues which relate to whether or not one is rejected or accepted and first on the list is, taste, or 'fashion.' With the death and dearth of brave and brilliant literary agents and publishers - although the developments online are helping improve this situation - it is the market which drives decisions. In other words, what the agents and publishers believe will sell is what matters, not the quality of the writing.

    So your writing may be utterly brilliant, but not to the 'taste' of agents, publishers and the market at this point in time. Rejections will push many to make a decision as to whether or not they continue to write in their own unique and distinct way, no matter if they are never accepted, or whether they will try to change their style to 'suit' the fashion. The latter choice will not gaurantee acceptance either. Which brings me to the other factor at work and that is fate.

    Returning to the stark reality that success and talent are not synonymous, and never have been, in any field, takes one to the issue of fate, destiny and plain old dumb luck. There are countless brilliant writers, poets, singers, artists, lawyers, architects - pick a profession or creative skill - out there who will never succeed. There are some who will, alongside lots of mediocre if not incompetent others.

    So while there may be valuable lessons to learn which may bring acceptance and success for some, for most there will not. And the only lesson left is to enjoy what you do, speak in your own true voice, gain satisfaction from your creative expression and leave the rest to fate.

    At the end of your life, the quality of your creative expression will not be important, no matter how much of a success or failure society might deem you to be; who you were, are and how you lived your life as a person first and writer second will be what matters, to you and to everyone else you touched.

  2. I think number one is underrated. Rejections can push a writer. Now, some self-publishing writers obviously push themselves to the top by focusing on craft and on continually getting better. But it can be almost too easy to self-publish. And if all a writer wants is to write some stories and find a small audience, then that's fine. All's well that ends well. But sometimes having hurdles to jump helps you get a little higher off the ground. There's something to be said for the cold reality of a rejection (though, if you want to self-publish, you can hopefully find a little cold reality from honest critique partners who will push you).

    1. I agree, Bryan. It is too easy to self publish. I've seen new writers who are working on their first draft of their first novel already talk about self publishing the book. My first, second, third books were not fit for anything sort of publishing. Period.

  3. Thanks, Jessica, for having me on your blog today! :D

  4. I agree with Roslyn Ross' statement above. Still, some rejections strike a bit harder than others, but the bruising does go away. And the acceptances bring enough satisfaction that both yeas and neighs push me forward. For me this year (so far) rejections are running about 2-1 over acceptances...and that's better than normal for me. Next year, maybe not so good. Either way, I'm not giving up my day job. If all else fails, I'll send my work to my mother...she has yet to reject me!

  5. True. Rejections teach us and one of the best measures of success is our ability to get up, brush ourselves off, figure out what's valid and keep going. Still, like any fall, the bruising always hurts.

  6. Glad I enjoy reading my genre.
    Rejections do make us just that more determined.

  7. Rejections can be useful, and a learning process. That's a good mantra to remember.

  8. Rejections can give us drive and determination. Yes they sting but they're a part of the process!

  9. I only suffer disappointment for a little while. Then its time to re-query or re-write.


  10. My post was really in regard to those who are in it for the long haul. Many people do fall in the face of rejection because for some, acceptance may be minimal or even not at all.

    Anyone who is called to write and who faces the possibility or the experience of being rejected in the main for decades needs to reach a place of acceptance and dedication to the writing art for itself.

    It is not easy to write without the encouragement of acceptance and publication. It is like spending days preparing a fabulous meal and having no-one eat but never telling you why. Too hot, too cold, too salty, too foreign, too plain, too rich. And when someone does like it but wants no more than a taste and is unable or unwilling to 'consume' the whole 'meal' it doesn't really mean much.

    It takes enormous courage and dedication, or perhaps pig-headedness, to write without the support of acceptance and in the face of constant rejection. Writing is perhaps unique in that all that effort can be for virtually nothing in any real sense. You can self-publish and put it on a shelf, sure, but even with a painting, sculpture and other creative arts, you can give your work away as a gift, hand it over to someone who sees it and says they like it, hang it on the wall, put it on a shelf and have it receive an occasional admiring look – not so with books of prose or poetry. They must be picked up and read.

    My hat goes off to and my heart goes out to writers who write for their soul, with no acceptance and the possibility they will never get it. A sense of humour and a sense of perspective in regard to life is invaluable. :)


“I'm using my art to comment on what I see. You don't have to agree with it.” ~John Mellencamp

“Allowing an unimportant mistake to pass without comment is a wonderful social grace” ~Judith S. Marin

“I don't ever try to make a serious social comment.” ~Paul McCartney

“I'd make a comment at a meeting and nobody would even acknowledge me. Then some man would say the same thing and they'd all nod.” ~Charlotte Bunch

“Probably what my comment meant was that I don't care about the circumstances if I can tell the truth.” ~Sally Kirkland

“We're not going to pay attention to the silliness and the petty comments. And quite frankly, women have joined me in this effort, and so it's not about appearances. It's about effectiveness.” ~Katherine Harris